{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by JANOVA617:
4/27/2021 1:10:29 PM
21
How fair is Guardian Games really?
I'm not salty or anything, just genuinely curious. How large is the population difference between hunters, Warlcoks, and titans exactly? Because if it is as large as you guys made it seem, exactly how many boost will titans or Warlcoks need to even be on par with hunter numbers?
And how do these boost work exactly? Are they accumulative throughout the entire event? Or are they reset each ceremony? The titans have been last but they at least should have 4 or 5 boost now? Yet their position is unchanged and (while closer) still dont look like they'll be passing warlocks anytime soon. Now I would have to have an exact number, but just looking at this mathematically if the hunters have such a massive population advantage then warlocks and titans only chance is to get a certain number of boost before they can even really compete. So if they use this same model next time hunters will be consistently in the lead until titans or Warlcoks LOSE enough, that's.......not really much of a competition is it? I think this system needs some more tweaking but I might be wrong.
-
1 ReplyEdited by jonpall: 4/26/2021 11:47:01 PMIt's literally completely meaningless. Ive done all my guardian games stuff on my hunter just because it's the class I have battlegrounds unlocked on and I wanted to do a concurrent activity while I grinded out seasonal challenges. If I could do it on warlock I would but I cant be bothered to unlock battlegrounds again so the 4 platinum medals I have earned all went to hunters. It is no indicator of fairness, of class balance, of anything whatsoever, and the class that wins doesn't even get anything. It is not worth any complaints, there are infinitely bigger problems than who wins the guardian games.
