Like the title says...
Well, thoughts on this video? I rather agree with his description.
People are against it because of:
[quote]A moral imperative implied within an ancient Middle-Eastern story involving a women made of a man's rib being convinced by a talking snake to eat the fruit of a magical tree[/quote]
and
[quote] an affirmation recorded in a surviving copy of a copy of an amateur copy of an amateur copy of a version of a translation of a 40 year old non eyewitnesses spread around via word of mouth account of something apparently said by an itinerant apocalyptic prophet 200 decades ago[/quote]
Now with that said, and before I get insulted for being "disrespectful to religion" I do respect people who are religious, but fail to understand and comprehend the reasoning behind attacking same sex marriage using the bible.
tl;dr I respect the person and not the reasoning they use
-
Edited by Spilled Milk: 2/2/2013 10:07:12 PMIf you want to vote for same sex marriage, go ahead. But I do have issue with this. [quote] an affirmation recorded in a surviving copy of a copy of an amateur copy of an amateur copy of a version of a translation of a 40 year old non eyewitnesses spread around via word of mouth account of something apparently said by an itinerant apocalyptic prophet 200 decades ago[/quote] Ok, if he is referring to Jesus, he is messed up on multiple accounts. First (though this is a bit petty) He was not 40, He was 30 when He began his ministry. (which lasted about 3 years) Second, it was based on eyewitness testimony. If the Gospels are considered unreliable, all of Socrates' writings should all be thrown out, as well as many "reliable" old documents. According to our way of measuring authenticity, the Gospels are more reliable than most documents we trust. Finally, yes, I do trust what He has said. Is it not a right to have an opinion? I am not going to try to harm any homosexuals, or act violently if it is legalized. However, I am not about to change my views to make someone else happy.