You need Huntsman if you want the White House in 2016.
Discuss
-
They don't need Huntsman. They need to adjust their platform to better represent what Americans actually want and they need to jettison their psuedo intellectual members who desperately try to justify the unjustifiable.
-
Why is it that almost every spokesperson for the GOP is either a little crazy, or kind of an asshole? They really need better spokespeople.
-
Not only do "real" Republicans need Huntsman, but they need the Tea Partiers to split off into their own 3rd party. They're a cancer to the GOP.
-
Only GOP candidate I know of that I'd consider voting for is Christie. But what the GOP really needs to do is refrain from ever speaking the word "-blam!-" and quit trying to out-crazy each other on immigration. GOP lost the African American vote when they opposed the civil rights movement. I doubt that will be forgiven any time soon. If the GOP can't stop pissing off all of Latin America with their immigration ranting, simple demographics will mean they won't win the presidency for a long time.
-
Not really. I don't see Huntsman being a GOP nominee, given that he's like one of the few Republican politicians who have the same social views as the democrats, or at least some anyway.
-
Huntsman would be the only GOP nominee I would vote for - as in, he's not super crazy. Too bad with the Tea Party control, the GOP won't be seeing a centrist or liberal Conservative for a while.
-
He wants the Republicans to be more centrist. As long as the Tea Party extremists have the GOP committee by the balls they won't ever do it.
-
The only way he's getting through that primary though is if he sacrifices his integrity. McCain was butchered in the Republican primary because he had to pander to the right wing crazies and turn his back on many of the things he once stood for in order to get the nomination.
-
It doesn't matter if they are democrip or rebloodlican, they are truly one Big Government Party that harms us equally.