{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
[This group has been deleted]
This thread is inspired by another: view original post
Edited by Recon Number 54:
3/18/2013 8:43:05 PM
20
Do you want there to be a Halo Reach anniversery?
Well, do ya think there should be one or not? I for one think there should be but I'm worried 343 might screw up on it...your opinion???
-
1 ReplyNot only no, but hell no. Why would I want 343 lolIndustries to screw up Reach worse than they already have. They've already removed very popular playlists from Reach. Playlists that had a vastly higher regular player count than their own mentally retarded "Super Slayer", amongst others. Why give them a chance to ruin one of the good Halo games? 343 is nothing but a death knell for the Halo franchise.
-
Edited by ZealotSG: 3/24/2013 6:52:55 AM343 be irreverent again, towards one of Bungie's Halos? No!! But if it happens, I hope they throw in more checkpoint delay options. Reach has second best checkpoint system (CE has the best). H4 is third best because it left out repeating checkpoints and checkpoints in general are very scarce. H2 and H3 are tied; H3 has repeating checkpoints, H2 has low shield delay.
-
I hope, but I want the assault rifle is 60 bullet again like CE, I do miss those AR, and the Halo CE pistol, the best as ever :)
-
343i screwed it up once, and they don't need to screw it up again.
-
6 RepliesReach? Besides Forge, what did it do right?
-
Reach came out in 2010, why would we need a remake for it?
-
Uh, no I'd rather see Viva Pinata, Barbie Edition, with Smurfs and Care Bears before I see anything Reach.
-
9 RepliesNo. I like it. But Ithink H2 A or H3A should be last
-
No, only Halo 2: Anniversary would make sense since it was a Xbox title and not in HD. Still, it is playable on the 360 but without live.
-
Bit soon for that.
-
Reach is so full of content that it would be hard to justify the time put into a remake. ODST might be a better candidate on that note. But honestly, would anyone get it? Would you also do a Halo: Combat Evolved 20th Anniversary? Move on, man.
-
[u] [i][b]LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL[/b][/i][/u]
-
Edited by Winters Darkseid: 3/18/2013 11:51:33 PMWhat are you gonna suggest next, remake Duke Nukem Forever? Get the -blam!- outta here with that bullshit
-
Wait until later. It is a good game and I still play it. No need for anniversary until it is 10 years later.
-
How do you screw up something that's already screwed up t the point of failing facial recognition.
-
1 ReplyHalo 2 Anniversary. 'Nuff said.
-
Edited by Faux Noise: 3/18/2013 9:14:11 PMNo, because it'll be designed for bad players like you. So what are your excuses?
-
No. That's not because I dislike Reach..... it's just that I think 343i should stop riding off Bungie's original works and strike out on their own. Good on them for making H4, but then again half the assets in H4 were copied from Reach so again they were riding off Bungie's work even with their big new Halo game. Anniversary games, like the inevitable H2 Anniversary, are just easy cheap sure-fire ways for 343i to make money without barely having to do anything whatsoever. Which I think is pathetic.
-
No. Typically you remake good games.
-
No,No,NO
