Palmer, without a doubt. She's just a stupid bitch, and her "character" if you even want to call it that, just consists of a bunch of retarded stereotypes with absolutely no depth, and nothing more, she's just an abrasive and offensive character....*sigh* such a waste of Jennifer Hale's talents, I mean, going from voicing Commander Shepard to-t-to that, that....[i][b][u]thing[/u][/b][/i]? -___- Other than Palmer though, I'd have to say it's 343i's Didact in Halo 4....it's just one big derailment of his character, both what Bungie established throughout the Trilogy, and what 343i was doing with their own canon in the Forerunner Saga up until Silentium.....apparently they forgot to give Greg Bear the memo that they planned on turning the Didact into some completely flat, boring, card-board cutout of a villain, as that's never how Bear portrayed him, either that or they changed their -blam!-ing minds midway through production of his books.....in either case, it's both bad writing [i]and[/i] bad management. The Derpdact is one of the worst things that 343idiocy has done to -blam!- Halo. Now they're not just attacking random parts of the story that don't fit what they want to do, now they're attacking, warping, and changing part of Halo's very foundation in order fit their own ends.....that is something you absolutely [i][b][u]NEVER[/u][/b][/i] do if you're taking over someone else's series, you hold to their vision and their canon throughout. You don't just change it or scrap it because you don't like or don't feel like doing that, then it's no longer the series you were hired to write for or replace the writers for, it's instead your own series and own invention that you're trying desperately to dress up as the successful series.