[url=http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/06/21/halo-reclaimer-trilogy-expanded-to-saga]Link[/url] [quote]While Halo 4 was originally meant to kick off the "Reclaimer Trilogy" for the series, Microsoft's Phil Spencer says it won't be limited to a trilogy.
"While we originally said trilogy, we've actually expanded this to more of a saga," Spencer told GameSpot, "so we don't want to limit the Reclaimer story within a trilogy." Spencer declined to specify whether the Xbox One Halo title was Halo 5 proper or a spinoff of sorts, opting instead to say that it's "a legitimate version of Halo" Microsoft will detail in the future.[/quote] So There was supposed to only be Halo 4,5, and 6, but now that trilogy is apparently going to be a saga, which is 6 games.
Microsoft sure loves their milk.
-
The quality will only get worse. It took them 4 years to make Halo 4. Blah blah blah 343 fanboys, I don't wanna hear it "but that was their first game they will do better next time!" yeah no. More games means they will care less about each individual one. Even worse all previous Halo games will get even more of a boot and they won't care to go back and update playlists like they have so poorly neglected Halo 3 and Reach already. Halo is now a cash cow, not a quality game you'd wait every 3 years for and could play for 10 without being bored. I'm still playing Halo 3. That is a quality Halo game. Halo 4 doesn't even last a year for most people lol