I don't mind getting more planets over time. At the very least, we know that Bungie isn't trying to bite off more than they can chew by creating a ton of areas without content to match. Of course, we don't know how much content we're going to get with the areas they are creating, but I'm pretty confident they will do well with what they have.

Good find!

I like the sound of that

I would be OK with that, I feel that would keep people coming back to the game and not rushing though and then let it sit for a long time.

Whether true or not, this isn't a big issue for me. As long as I'm playing Destiny, I don't care if I get one, two, or eight worlds. It'll all be beautiful and new. It's the unknown that I crave. The unexplored frontier. That's where you'll find this Vampire.

It sounds to me like comet 1 will "unlock" the rest of the planets.

as far as im aware, we have all the planets that have been mentioned(earth,mars,venus and the moon), and ofc the mythix get Uranus. i was under the impression that the DLC's we're going to be moons and asteroids..that kinda thing.

Those quotes don't seem to be confirming or denying anything.

Bu.... Buht..... thars microspofic life on Ploto

Interesting how he avoided the Destiny 2, 3 question. Now in the latest interview it came out that 4 games plus 4 major DLC expansions are still the plan. Curious to see if they use sequels as a carry through or stand alone games.

this doesn't bother me at all, whether they expand the game through DLC or sequels, i am happy with how it's shaping up atm

Very similar to MMOS.. actually the exact same as MMOs. I love it... brings back that old "expansion pack" feel.. instead of DLC. Only other game that I still play that uses expansion packs is WoW.

Comets..the expansions are called Comets.

I'd prefer Bungie take this approach. It's never been done before, and they're really aiming to change the way people play games...again.

I hope I can still travel a great deal of planets

If they aren't, then all Bungie is doing is making Halo over again, because if you can't keep moving forward what is the point other than to play PVP.

I think it's a pretty cool approach to building the destiny world. One plus, is that new players who pickup the destiny game wouldn't need to purchase the new content until they reach that part of the story unless they wanted it ready or something. So that in itself is really cool. Sometimes game developers understand a lot of new players join in their sequels without ever playing the part 1 of the games legacy. This pretty much takes care of that. New players wouldn't buy destiny and the new content and magically be ported to that campaign point of the game. However, they would have access to that planet though. If the game is not linear at all, it is quite possible the new players can port themselves directly to the new areas and start the campaign differently. Though I find that unlikely. This game is all about telling a story and living it, not getting cliff notes to skip to a certain chapter. There will probably be a main plot, and many sub plots within the story to take away the feeling of the game being considered a pipeline type of story play. This way the games got it's own massive irrigation system in the works, everything connected in a seamless flow. So you can be on a early chapter of the campaign mode, yet travel to a distant planet where the main campaign would normally take you towards the end, and instead of play the main plot perhaps be apart of a sub plot that still has references affiliated with the main plot. side missions, and main missions to progress story line. Some side missions will probably be affected by the story timeline. Meaning that different missions will probably be available or become unavailable depending on where you are at in the game if any of those missions involve main characters or alliances dependent to the mission. So I think it's a cool idea, and wouldn't have any negative affect on old vs new players.