JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#Gaming

8/21/2013 6:57:56 PM
59

The Elder Scrolls Online: Now P2P

So... they just came out and announced that TES Online will have a subscription. $15 a month, the first month free when you buy the game itself (so not really 'free'). I was excited for this game. I can honestly say there's zero chance of me getting it now, which really bums me out. Anybody else disappointed by the news? Thoughts on it? Just figured I'd spread the news since I don't see a thread on it. [url=http://www.gamestar.de/spiele/the-elder-scrolls-online/artikel/www.gamestar.de/spiele/the-elder-scrolls-online/artikel/the_elder_scrolls_online,44578,3026853.html]Link for the curious[/url], shared by the The Elder Scrolls page itself. I'm so bummed out.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Ok to clarify, The P2P business model is fine for PC gamers who are accustomed to playing a few games. The P2P model however completely nullifies any previous attempts to market to the console gamers (Me). -The "Next-Gen" consoles will cost a pretty penny. -Both Online models will require their own subscription/ fee. -Console gamers also play many games regularly. All of these things further dissuade console to commit to a primary game which requires its own subscription (whatever the cost). Heck, only about 20% of console gamers even buy DLC. Zenimax has done some serious overhaul of Elder Scroll Online since their Console announcement. Most of those changes are to make the game more attractive to the millions of Xbox players that made Skyrim the 2nd most played Xbox game (behind Cod). (sorry PlayStation gamers, Bethesda left you to die). Basically, many of the PC gamers reading this will be unfazed by the $15 a month subscription fee, others like Console gamers just canceled their pre-orders. Not to jump into something I know little about, but the F2P model is generally redden with play-to-win advertisements and so on, making it an obvious bad choice. I think ZeniMax Online Studios and Bethesda should have gone with the Guild Wars: Buy then Play approach if they really wanted to avoid all this backlash

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon