{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/9/2013 11:31:59 PM
12
Frames per Second
I was wondering if some tech-savvy user could help me out.
I have a couple of questions about the FPS (or Frames per Second) on Consoles, specifically the 360 and One.
So, Call of Duty runs a solid 60 FPS, right? That's why it's so smooth. But if I were to go play, say, Crysis 2 on my 360, it would feel weird and unresponsive, correct?
If so, is 60 FPS the highest FPS we've achieved? Is there a 90 FPS?
Thanks :)
-
7 RepliesMost Xbox games are 24 - 30 fps. COD is (of the top of my head) the only games that runs at more on a console. This is on consoles we are talking about though. I get about 120 fps on battlefield 3 on PC, about 200 on Diablo 3, about 180 on Path of Exile. This why, no offence to any next-gen console buyers, that when PC gamers mockingly point out console restrictions, especially on the new next gen models, it's because these consoles aren't really "next generation" - they are merely catching up to what a PC could do 5 years ago. Sure, they are better than the consoles we have now. But they are still restrictive in terms of what the technology can handle. This is further highlighted when consoles owners say that consoles are cheaper than PCs - yes they are, but to buy a PC that can run a game @ 1080p, 60fps it will cost you the same as a console, because it's actually not that impressive any more, especially when you factor in that PC can also add filtering effects, anti-aliasing, texture effects, buffering and sampling. /wall
