JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
9/13/2013 8:57:04 PM
31

Are breasts inherently sexual?

It seems like a common trend, particularly for outspoken feminists, is to claim breasts aren't inherently sexual. Usually this in response to some sort of discussion about modesty. I've also seen it here plenty of time. But this just doesn't make sense to me...obviously they're not reproductive organs in most contexts, but that doesn't mean they aren't sexual. And the fact that, long ago or in undeveloped countries, it was considered normal to be bare-breasted in public, doesn't change the fact that breasts invoke a strong sexual response in males (or anyone attracted to women). So Flood, we all know this forum is the threshing floor of scientific controversy, so what's your opinion? And in looking up sites for this discussion, I came across a golden Cosmo article: [url=http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/hot-sex/hot-sex-tips-challenge-18]How to Have Boob Sex[/url] Yep. Someone actually wrote that. As well as the following astute Yahoo response: [quote][Breasts are] not a reproductive organ, though you can titty fcuk a girl[/quote]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • I heard that as early human ancestors began to work upright, they began to use breasts as the main method to distinguish between sexes and to help outline a suitable mate. When we were on all fours, that role was filled by a large arse (an instinct which appears to continue on today)

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    3 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon