{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by TopWargamer:
11/5/2013 10:50:36 PM
73
And the reviews are in! CoD: Ghosts sucks!
>12 year old's face when CoD: Ghosts: http://windoge.com/
Metacritic user score: 1.8 (118 negative reviews): http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/call-of-duty-ghosts
Giant Bomb (3/5 stars): http://www.giantbomb.com/reviews/call-of-duty-ghosts-review/1900-603/
Destructoid (5/10 stars): http://www.destructoid.com/review-call-of-duty-ghosts-264903.phtml
And then there's IGN...giving it an 8.8. Totally not paid at all. http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/11/05/call-of-duty-ghosts-review
And on Steam, as of writing up this thread, CoD: Ghosts multiplayer is sitting at #5 on Steam's game chart: http://store.steampowered.com/stats/
So...a couple things...
1) It's pretty hilarious how everybody is giving it bad ratings yet IGN gave it an 8.8.
2) I personally don't like CoD so I won't be buying this game.
If you own CoD: Ghosts, what are your thoughts on the game, and do you think it deserves these ratings?
(I personally think that it does.)
-
Edited by halo: 11/6/2013 3:28:17 AMIt's horribly unoptimized for the PC. I got it, I had fun. But I haven't played CoD in a while. It's the same CoD I used to enjoy. They didn't do anything particularly bad with the game, they just didn't do anything new or innovative. Same game, whether you enjoy it is up to you. But like TB said, "Where does CoD go from here?". I really can't imagine CoD being any different, which obviously isn't a good thing but that's just a sign that they should stop making it for a while. It's also interesting CoD was so innovative and revolutionary when it first came out, but they haven't innovated since. You would think that the people who thought up the ideas for CoD4 would have come up with something new by then.
