And fixed all of the original's flaws, would you play it? To be clear, I'm talking about an actual campaign, better A.I., better servers for less lag in multiplayer matches, as well as the tweaking or overhauling of any game features thought of as major flaws that I have omitted.
Personally, if a Brink sequel were to be improved in every way from the original, I would play it. I thought the Ark was pretty cool, and would love to see Brink reach or exceed the original expectations of its consumers. However, I'd wait for the ratings to come in first; I don't want a repeat occurrence.
Please describe why you voted the way you did.
-
Edited by Gregory Marshall: 11/11/2013 10:45:29 PMI believe their approach in design is novel enough that if they [i]did[/i] fix all of the original flaws (of which the game had many of) I would definitely give it a second chance, if only to shake up try something genuinely unique from time-to-time.