And fixed all of the original's flaws, would you play it? To be clear, I'm talking about an actual campaign, better A.I., better servers for less lag in multiplayer matches, as well as the tweaking or overhauling of any game features thought of as major flaws that I have omitted.
Personally, if a Brink sequel were to be improved in every way from the original, I would play it. I thought the Ark was pretty cool, and would love to see Brink reach or exceed the original expectations of its consumers. However, I'd wait for the ratings to come in first; I don't want a repeat occurrence.
Please describe why you voted the way you did.
-
I liked Brink... Their biggest flaw was emphasizing the story before launch and the talk of "blurring the lines between singleplayer and multiplayer". Brink was a multiplayer game through and through. And the lag was only a real problem for the first week after launch.