This is going to be a thread calling out and chastising a user on this site, leave now if you don't want to see ramblings and things pointing out someone's bullshit. I'm talking about CamCamm here, because honestly, this has been something I've always seen from her, and the way some of the fools on here will act like she does no wrong when she acts like a raging hormonal teenager all the time is absurd and ludicrous. Just now in her ASMR thread: [quote]OT: For some reason I'm just not that fascinated by this, normally things relating to the brain or body interest me somewhat but ASMR just doesn't do it, mostly because it seems pointless to me. I don't need to go out of my way to activate it through it's myriads of complicated reactions when I can just talk dirty with someone, or get a backrub from someone, and so on and so forth and probably get the same thing out of it all. Seems monotonous.[/quote] My main reply, and this is what I get in response: [quote]The fact that you would relate this to something sexual, shows just how big of a -blam!-ing tool you really are. [quote]ASMRs are intimate but not sexual, feel-good but not orgasmic, private but not secret.[/quote] Learn to read AND give proof of your accusations against me, which I obviously wont read anyway. Good luck with growing up, Kid.[/quote] Now this is the most strikingly hypocritical thing I've seen from her recently. Two of her threads could very easily fit into what I was saying, the Alcohol Disaronno one that got bumped awhile ago, and the Breast Cancer one, which was evidently and clearly filled to the brim with innuendos by her and other people at one point. So how does what I say illicit a reaction like this? Because she thinks that her putting tags in the OP that say "Orgasm" and orgasms being mentioned dozens of times everywhere not have any synonymous relations to sexual interaction all of a sudden? So not only does it seem that, but from her own post as follows: "Now, there's not much research on this and people experience ASMR in so many different ways that it's incredibly hard to describe," that there is a decent percentage of a chance that someone may experience it in a sexual manner, especially when intimate and close-up examples are given for someone's experience in it, it's also still very possible that it can have a sexual meaning. So she loses her shit over this and acts like a teenager and no one points out her bullshit? I'm honestly a tad surprised, because I don't condone or accept those users on here that want to talk and reference her as being some back-alley-Sally, that's going too far and we're assuming far too much about her outside activities, but when she is one of the most egregious and nonsensical posters on here from time to time, why does no one point it out legitimately? If you make a point to her in a thread, she'll talk down to you and call you "Kid" or "Kiddo", and with no legitimate reasoning. Did you make a point in response to her somewhere? Well she's just going to blow it off and analyze it like you were starting an argument and immediately from the start cursing and using ad hominems, so she's flipping it around and making you seem like the villain, then blowing if off in as lazy a manner as possible with "K" or something else that insults the authenticity of what you say for no rhyme or reason. So why do we put up with this crap? Why do we tolerate someone that is 28 with kids, but acts like a hormonal teenager, then say she does no wrong and is one of the greatest posters to grace this site? Because she sure as shit is damn far from it, and any actual development in the way of someone respectful and conscientious I have not seen her do to anyone that isn't immediately buddy-buddy with her, which brings all kinds of biases into the equation. We shouldn't accept that our friend might have radical and insane beliefs and views. We should be pointing them out and asking why they have them, and if they're too far obsessed with what they believe when it's very negative or incorrect, then we're only allowing that behavior to go on. [spoiler]There is no TL;DR here, you either read the whole thing and reply to it constructively, or I ignore what you have to say, I'm not going to deal with people who don't want to look upon this objectively.[/spoiler]