[quote]The US authorities have studied online sexual activity and suggested exposing porn site visits as a way to discredit people who spread radical views, the Huffington Post news site has reported.
It published a document, leaked by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden, identifying two Muslims said to be vulnerable to accusations of "online promiscuity".
An official said this was unsurprising.
But campaign group Privacy International called it "frightening".
It names six Muslims whom it describes as "prominent, globally resonating foreign radicalisers" about whom surveillance efforts had revealed potential "vulnerabilities that can be exploited".
It says the information is largely based on gathered "Sunni extremist communications", including material sourced by the FBI.
"Some of the vulnerabilities, if exposed, would likely call into question a radicaliser's devotion to the jihadist cause, leading to the degradation or loss of his authority," it says.[/quote]
Honestly, I can't really argue with this idea.
-
So they show them porn and that is supposed to shame them?
-
Thank you, Declined's article was lacking in information.
-
That's hilarious XD But why would it affect them? Aren't women dirt? [spoiler]or was it gay porn? Hehehe[/spoiler]
-
delta is expressing dissidence! Quick, tell everyone he watched 'MILF & Cookies 9'!!!!
-
What happens when the radical porn-ists attack?