[quote]A US federal judge has ruled that mass government surveillance of the phone network is legal, a week after another court said the opposite.
New York District Judge William Pauley described the snooping as a "counter-punch" against al-Qaeda.
He said the National Security Agency (NSA) programme might even have prevented the 9/11 attacks.
Last week a Washington DC federal judge ruled the surveillance was "likely unconstitutional" and "Orwellian".
But in Friday's decision, Judge Pauley, of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, said "the balance of equities and the public interest tilt firmly in favour of the Government's position".
[/quote]
[quote]he concluded: "The right to be free from searches and seizures is fundamental, but not absolute."
He also noted: "Every day, people voluntarily surrender personal and seemingly-private information to trans-national corporations, which exploit that data for profit.
"Few think twice about it, even though it is far more intrusive than bulk telephony metadata collection.
"There is no evidence that the Government has used any of the bulk telephony metadata it collected for any purpose other than investigating and disrupting terrorist attacks."
[/quote]
-
Edited by Fallen Hero: 12/27/2013 8:59:12 PM[quote]he concluded: "The right to be free from searches and seizures [u]is fundamental, but not absolute.[/u] [/quote] When I read the constitution I never seen any exceptions. [quote]"[u]There is no evidence[/u] that the Government has used any of the bulk telephony metadata it collected for any purpose other than investigating and disrupting terrorist attacks." [/quote] Yeah because the information is kept in secret from the public.
-
At first I really hated the NSA but once I saw what they were actually doing, that they can't even see the names of the phone numbers, where it's coming from or whatever other personal information there might be without going through the courts, what they're doing is actually very beneficial to national security.
-
There's nothing unconstitutional about collecting metadata. You don't own that info, your service provider does, just like how Facebook owns your ad preferences.
-
A district judge of NY does not over rule a FEDERAL judge. The UNLAWFUL NSA spying is still Unconstitutional. How this shit has not gone to SCOTUS yet is beyond my comprehension.
-
lol district judges [spoiler]didn't something like this happen in Utah recently? like, a district judge approved gay marriage for the whole state at random with no debating or any processes, and then even though the federal judges told him no, the stupid shit went on with it anyway?[/spoiler]
-
Don't feel left out. NSA spys on your people too.
-
Edited by DeclinedA01: 12/27/2013 8:10:02 PMNvm. They're both district judges.
-
Why would he give his opinion it doesnt matter if a federal judge states otherwise.
-
that judge is a rich man.
-
i want to take this seriously i really, really do
-
Ridiculous.