JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
Edited by Mags: 3/12/2014 4:04:01 AM
19

5.5 Million Syrian Children In Need

[quote]The number of Syrian children in need has more than doubled in the past year to 5.5 million, the United Nations Children's Fund (Unicef) says. Up to a million are living under siege and in areas that the agency and other humanitarian organisations cannot access, according to a new report. Children in Syria have lost "lives and limbs, along with virtually every aspect of their childhood", it warns. UN figures say more than 10,000 have been killed in three years of conflict. However, the report notes that real number is probably higher.[/quote] Let's also look at this recent report: Assad Using Starvation Tactics http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-26481422 [quote]Starvation tactics against civilians are being used as a weapon of war by the Syrian government, the human rights group Amnesty International says. A new report says at least 128 refugees have died at the besieged Yarmouk camp in Damascus as a result. It says thousands of people still trapped there face a "catastrophic humanitarian crisis". Amnesty says families have been forced to forage for food in the streets - risking being killed by snipers. There were reports of fresh fighting on the edge of the camp last week.[/quote] Let's look at yet two more reports outlining the dangers of jihadists in Syria. One--[url=http://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/030614AM_Testimony%20-%20Daveed%20Gartenstein-Ross.pdf]Here[/url] Two: [url=https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/uploads/Documents/testimony/LevittTestimony20140306-reschedule.pdf]here[/url] A little snippet from the latter: [quote]In Syria, these foreign fighters are learning new and more dangerous tools of the trade in a very hands-on way, and those who do not die on the battlefield will ultimately disperse to all corners of the world better trained and still more radicalized than they were before. DNI Clapper stressed that it is not only foreign fighters who are drawn to Syria today but also “technologies and techniques that pose particular problems to our defenses. We are concerned,” CIA director John Brennan testified, “about the use of Syrian territory by the al Qaeda organization to recruit individuals…to use Syria as a launching pad” for attacks on the West. But the threat is not limited to actual al-Qaeda groups or operatives, nor is it limited to attacks targeting the West. The majority of radicalized fighters are likely to return home and attack their own homelands even before they seek to strike ours, in large part because the events that have followed the Arab Spring have created conditions favorable for militant Islamist revival—social and militant both—across the region. [/quote] But yet most of you say that this isn't our (the West) problem. It very well is. Your thoughts on any reports outlined in this thread? Your thoughts on Syria?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by Vicex: 3/12/2014 4:07:13 AM
    I hate to say it, but if you help countries--not individuals--entire countries that cannot support themselves and insist on letting their population boom, you are only setting up the world to fail. So is it the west's problem? Not really. Is it the West's fault? Arguably so. If it is the fault of the West, do we have an obligation to help? Only if countries slow down population booms and even then, through education- not fiscal assistance. The problem is allocation of resources, if a country can never support itself, it will require an ever increasing allocation of resources from wealthier countries that have an ever decreasing supply. At some point, you need to say NO, because at that point the country cannot support itself and eventual, no country will be able to support it. When aide is given, it should be only something that is an investment (education) that can give a return on that investment later (less need to spend on a certain country). OR is should only be in a time of extreme need, such as a drought or natural disaster. Does internal conflict count as a time of extreme need? I'd argue that it is ONLY if the country is not in constant conflict. If it is, then giving money isn't going to fix the problem, because the problem will re occur and then more funds are needed of those "in need". The solution here is redrawing borders to accommodate vastly different cultures and ideologies OR education so we can get rid of the religious influence on these internal conflicts that are over blood-fueds that are centuries old.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon