So, if anybody watches ESPN or follows NFL, you have probably heard of the the NFL executive that anonymously said this about Jadeveon Clowney:
[quote]“He’s spoiled, and he’s lazy,’’ the NFC personnel man told Eckel. “He’s never worked hard a day in his life, now all of a sudden you’re going to give him a bunch of money and expect him to work hard. I don’t see it.’[/quote]
This is against what most people think because Clowney is projected the #1 overall pick in this year's draft.
But now comes the question that has been asked recently because of this statement. Should sports news like this not be anonymous? Should they be made to have their name identified? Of course, they shouldn't get any repercussions because of what they say.
What do ya'll think? Should people like this be made to identify themselves, when they make statements such as this?
[spoiler]Clowney comes from the SEC. SEC is best.[/spoiler]
-
Edited by PSU 975: 4/15/2014 12:37:11 AM[quote] What do ya'll think? Should people like this be made to identify themselves, when they make statements such as this? [/quote] No, If that were the case, ESPN and the majority of sports reporters would be out of a job. They live on anonymous sources close to teams. Also, for the record, I agree completely with this NFC exec. Clowney is a special talent, but he will get money and never work hard and be out of the NFL within 5 years.