{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/28/2014 11:22:33 PM
6
replay value
Ok so me and my friend are in a argument about Titanfall vs Battlefield 4. He says Battlefield is better while I say Titanfall is better. He says that Titanfall has NO REPLAY VALUE. Does anyone want to help settle the argue meant over Titanfall vs Battlefield 4, please be descriptive with your opinion.
-
Both have almost no replay value beside MP.
-
Edited by Tyger: 4/29/2014 1:38:53 AMI don't understand how a multiplayer only game could possibly have "replay value." Longevity maybe, but not "replay value" considering there's nothing to replay.
-
Well, Titanfall is CoD with mechs, and BF4 is just BF3.5.
-
Edited by SpartaBagelz: 4/29/2014 1:22:09 AMTitanfall has little to no replay value. It has multiplayer and that's pretty much it. BF is broken though. It's campaign is still horrible as well. The servers are horrible but that isn't Dice's fault it's EA's. Id say that neither one has replay value but overall Titan fall is more innovative and, while not as customizable, it's a better experience.
-
I think Titanfall has better replay value. It was sort of made that way.
-
I have never owned any Xbox... However from what I have seen of both games titanfall is many times better than battlefield.
