Yes, wait. Because if you haven't noticed, EVERYBODY seems to be getting divorces nowadays. Why? Because people get married because of sex. They think they found their soulmate, then when they stop getting the sex they want, they find it in other people. But if you base your relationship not on sex, but on simply knowing the other person, then your relationship will be so much stronger.

Did you learn that in Dating 101? If I wanted relationship advice I definitely wouldn't get it from the people on here. Sex is an important part of relationships. Knowing one another includes knowing one another sexually. Plus, I'm in my early 20s. No way am I looking to date someone seriously. I know what kind of person I want and I know what kind of person I am. But I'm also young and not weighed down be ye olde ball and chain, and intend to keep my personal freedom as long as possible. Marriage is great for those people who want to get married. But I don't. I know how to have good relationships. I've just been -blam!-ed over too many times for caring about people who didn't give a shit about me and I'm done the whole relationship thing for a while. Besides, I'd much rather have casual sex with a couple girls every so often then have to deal with an annoying, jealous girlfriend with daddy issues all the damn time.

So you expect to eventually find your future wife by sleeping with people until you find them? Your right: sex is an important part of relationships. But on what level of relationship should it be introduced? Marriage. To vow to love one person, then demonstrate that physically emotionally and verbally is a solid foundation. If you sleep around, then vow to remain with one person forever, how can they believe you when your past says the opposite?

[quote]So you expect to eventually find your future wife by sleeping with people until you find them?[/quote] In my post I stated that marriage is not for me. Thus one might deduce that I am not looking for a wife. [quote]Your right: sex is an important part of relationships.[/quote] Tell me something I don't know. [quote]But on what level of relationship should it be introduced?[/quote] Whenever both parties feel comfortable. If that's the first date then fine. If they want to wait till marriage that's also fine. You and I have no right to impose our ideas about sex on other people, so this is a loaded and pointless question. [quote]Marriage. To vow to love one person, then demonstrate that physically emotionally and verbally is a solid foundation. If you sleep around, then vow to remain with one person forever, how can they believe you when your past says the opposite?[/quote] Your posts lead me to think you believe that once someone is an "adulterer" then they will always be an "adulterer". If that is the case, then you are simply wrong. Believe it or not, people can change. But I digress... To answer your question: [b]Love[/b]. If they can't believe you about something as important as that, then they aren't the right person for you and you shouldn't marry them.

You assume I believe an adulterer will always be an adulterer. Have you ever been told that you shouldn't assume?

I did not assume anything. My exact words were "Your posts lead me to think you believe that once someone is an "adulterer" then they will always be an "adulterer". If that is the case, then you are simply wrong." The second sentence shows that, while I'm guessing you believe what I said, I'm not sure of what you believe, thus my use of the phrase "If that is the case." Your lack of a legitimate response to my post leads me to believe that you have exhausted your intellectual capabilities and have instead chosen to resort to infantile tactics such as what you posted. To answer your question: Yes, I have been told that you shouldn't assume because you end up making an ass out of "u" and "me." But that is completely irrelevant to the conversation we were having so unless you have something worthwhile to add, I suggest you get off this forum and go play in traffic.