The end product of how it is misshapen is irrelevant to how it was made. You can only assume if it were on purpose or not. Until the rules are rewritten, I have merely worked within the unspecified grey areas. You can imply what the rules should be, but implying is not clearly stating. All I'm trying to do is voice other people's frustration, not just my own. I'm trying to actually care for them and their freedom of expression. And yes, not everyone cares as much about this as I do, but I have seen enough concern over it to say something about it. If the rules were clearly defined, air tight, then I wouldn't have found the wiggle room I did. Not just that I read the rules, but I also looked at all the accepted users, because what's good for them is good for everyone else. People like things to be fair, and people like to be unique. I've done just that. This one design is not what you should be complaining about. The design I had taken too far was Ossku's original. Obviously that was outside the rules. Yet I asked for feedback anyway. When things aren't clear cut, you need to find how far you can go. Which I did. And I promptly fixed it. I know what I'm doing. And I'm not trying to make you look like the bad guy, I pointing out how strict you're being on [i]some [/i]people. Look, here's me trying to compromise with you. Either say in the rules "try to hand draw the best/closest circle you can",(obviously elaborated on) or make templates for people to use. Remember, if you want something done right, you have to do it yourself. (And I'm addressing you specifically because you are the OP of this thread, regardless of if this was entirely your idea or not.)