{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/4/2014 7:10:48 AM
30
Definitely Xbox will always be better. we dont win the begining of the console war but we always win in the end
English
-
not this time friend. ps4 is that much better
-
...and then you woke up.
-
Same thing happened to the ps3 right before ps4/xbox1 hit the market. It rallied and beat the xbox360 in its lifetime.. Weird
-
No it didn't...
-
Don't worry, he's a poor troll. This is the only way he gets any self gratification.
-
And I actually bought two xbox360, never owned a ps3.. Crazy though to see it end up at number 1 in that gen's lifecycle.
-
Xbox 360 destroyed the PS3 last generation.
-
While it seemed to deff dominate since it had the longer cycle, it didn't end it's cycle shipping/selling the most. Sorry but ever report up to the new gen consoles all point at ps3 rallying for number 1 spot.
-
I don't really consider that a win since the 360 was the preferred console for pretty much everything. And the PS3's sales can thank it's Blu ray player for that. Granted it's a shitty Blu ray player. But I guess that's interesting that it's surpassed 360 in shipment sales or whatever.
-
Yeah both numbers for either systems are the same retail/customers.. And they still do that with current gen numbers. Id probably think you could thank the japan market for backing the ps3 tho, I believe that was their largest market.. Unlike the ps4 numbers, US has it as of right now. But a current 3:1 ratio is a big difference considering the ps3 life span isn't completely over till the 2015 ps4 game line up.
-
Yes it did.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_million-selling_game_consoles No it did not.
-
One person links an actual article, one person links wikipedia...
-
And one just whines about it. Have you even read the sources or did some research for yourself?
-
I don't believe PS3 sales ever surpassed the 360. But I would find a better source than wikipedia if I needed to back that up. Observations > whining.
-
Edited by bLango: 8/4/2014 1:04:32 PMI don't get all that hating on Wiki-articles, they're backed up with more sources than the average person would ever read. Its the same as if you would do research for a week, just combined in that article. If there are better sources, the Wiki-article will most likely have a reference on that too.
-
[quote]I don't get all that hating on Wiki-articles, they're backed up with more sources than the average person would ever read. Its the same as if you would do research for a week, just combined in that article. If there are better sources, the Wiki-article will most likely have a reference on that too.[/quote] The PS3 outsold the 360 last generation. I take it you are from America, because that is the only region where the 360 had a larger userbase than the PS3. You linked Wikipedia which is a joke. Can you use Wikipedia as a source for anything meaningful, such as research or a paper at a university? The answer is no. Also the PS2 was the highest selling console of ALL TIME, meanwhile the Xbox barely pushed over 20 million units. Don't know how this person thinks that Xbox dominates PS, as it's not even close to PS in terms of sales. It's funny you think that people purchased re PS3 just for Blu Ray. Besides Halo 3 and Gears 1-2, the 360 didn't get shit. The second half of last generation my 360 collected dust.
-
I'm just replying one more time because of your argument about Wikipedia and university papers. Your argument would apply if this WAS a research or paper for university, but it is not. You can't always rely on it when it comes to science, medicin or something like that, where it took people hundreds of years to gain that information and generally very complex subjects. However, I think we can use it for things like console sales where the Wiki-article itself most likely refers to almost every reliable source.
-
[quote]I'm just replying one more time because of your argument about Wikipedia and university papers. Your argument would apply if this WAS a research or paper for university, but it is not. You can't always rely on it when it comes to science, medicin or something like that, where it took people hundreds of years to gain that information and generally very complex subjects. However, I think we can use it for things like console sales where the Wiki-article itself most likely refers to almost every reliable source.[/quote] No, it's not a reliable source. I could go on there now and edit it to say that the Microsoft 360 sold 1 billion consoles.
-
Wow, you just made a fool out of yourself. You (and unfortunately many others too) still think this is possible? That was five years ago, if not more. You can't just edit everything you want, there are now more than enough mods that proof-read and check your sources for that information before it gets published. Thanks for making clear you have no idea how Wikipedia works nowadays.
-
[quote]Wow, you just made a fool out of yourself. You (and unfortunately many others too) still think this is possible? That was five years ago, if not more. You can't just edit everything you want, there are now more than enough mods that proof-read and check your sources for that information before it gets published. Thanks for making clear you have no idea how Wikipedia works nowadays.[/quote] It's still an unreliable source, no matter how you try to spin it. Do yourself a favor, go to Google and read the 100's of articles stating the PS3 outsold the 360. All you're doing is digging a hole, and it's embarrassing how much you care about these sales figures.
-
If you choose to live with an outdated opinion I won't stop you. I stopped talking and caring about the sales since my first comment. But don't worry, that will be my last response, I don't see much use in responding any longer.
-
[quote]If you choose to live with an outdated opinion I won't stop you. I stopped talking and caring about the sales since my first comment. But don't worry, that will be my last response, I don't see much use in responding any longer.[/quote] Outdated opinion? It's a fact you moron. It's ok keep defending your precious console and to the death, but stop spreading misinformation. -blam!-ing fanboys
-
Calling me a moron doesn't prove it's a fact. Insulting somebody is the first step to losing an agrument. Here you go, a reliable source: http://usingsources.fas.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376 As I said before, it's not for writing papers, but reliable enough for trivial things like console sale numbers.
-
Why would you even bring the PS2 and original Xbox into this conversation? It's not even fair to bring them up because PS2 already made a name for itself with the first playstation. Xbox was a brand new console that no one was familiar with.
