I've seen numerous people criticize the loot system in PvP. The main complaint seems to be that no matter how well you do in the game, the rewards seem to be random, giving no incentive to play better.
So why not reward those atop the leader board by letting them loot those at the bottom. It would make perfect sense, as better players would get rewarded and bottom feeders would be penalized.
It's pure genius and certainly a way the game could be improved. I take offense to anyone who would presume to disagree.
-
Why am I tagged?
-
Edited by That Halo Dude: 8/21/2014 1:09:10 AMYou would let the high-scoring bourgeoisie steal from the common player? Step aside, Capitalist pig. [spoiler]Plus taking loot from crappy players would just get you crappy loot.[/spoiler]
-
Edited by DemonRonin: 8/21/2014 2:34:00 AM1/10 apparently not everyone can do what they do.
-
2/10 #keepyourdayjob The ending was weak. If you want to troll like a pro, you have to [b]invite [/b]criticism and turn it around. Calling your own (obviously batshit) concept "genius" gives the whole game away.
-
Hmm. As long as you didn't [i]take[/i] that item from the low scorer. If it copied it for you, then sure. Doesn't make much sense to me to penalize players that aren't as good, and then make it even harder for them to improve. The other problem with this is - what are the odds that that sucky player has something good that you don't already have?
-
-
You sir, have just been bested.
-
I guess you would have very little loot. Sorry :/