{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Winters Darkseid:
8/26/2014 3:38:58 AM
2
I take it as a general overview, rather than something concrete. It's a good reference for some tendencies, but I prefer the Enneagram. I find it far more insightful.
English
-
But the stats change so much in such little time it isn't reliable for that even
-
For some, yes. Jungian typology in general is somewhat flawed. Like I said, I find the Enneagram to be far more reliable. Still, the MBTI can be a good overview, provided the results remain consistent.
-
Well I only took it once, but I understand psychology enough to know it wasn't right for most of it.
-
I think he means that as far as MBTI tests go, this one is pretty bad.
-
Oh, I see. What I said still stands, though.
