{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/26/2014 4:08:08 AM
1
But the stats change so much in such little time it isn't reliable for that even
English
-
For some, yes. Jungian typology in general is somewhat flawed. Like I said, I find the Enneagram to be far more reliable. Still, the MBTI can be a good overview, provided the results remain consistent.
-
Well I only took it once, but I understand psychology enough to know it wasn't right for most of it.
