{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/25/2014 11:09:58 PM
1
I'm actually on the opposite end of this but even so, that sucks. I don't think luck should be removed, or that those who can't play as well should be "penalized". Ultimately, that's what it would be if the better players always get rewarded more. I'd say, if anything, keep the random chance, but give top players a higher percentage of getting something/something good. But still make it a chance, as in, you could end up with nothing. Maybe they even do that already, who knows.
English
-
I like this a lot. Make your position on the board about percentages. The higher you are the better the odds of you getting better gear.
-
Edited by CatFatius: 9/26/2014 12:10:31 AMYeah I agree with that too. I don't have a problem with the RNG in general. I see why it's there and it can be a nice surprise if you do get something unexpectedly. I certainly don't think lower scoring players should be penalised and I hope my comment didn't come across that way, I just feel that they really need to alter their algorithm slightly to favour and therefore reward the higher scoring players, as you suggested.
