If you could take Activision out of the creation of destiny but leave bungie in it... Who would you put in Activisions spot?
-
Bioware hands down!
-
It is pointless, because it all comes down to 4 LARGE corps and they are all the same. the only thing really change is the way they dress up the plate.
-
Sony or Microsoft. A company with deep pockets but enough smarts to get out if the way and let Bungie sink or swim on their own. The only issue, of course, is that it would then be a platform-exclusive (which I hate).
-
Ubisoft
-
Infinity ward = activision anyway. IW is a dev and owned by activision.
-
Edited by LozzaBurger: 10/1/2014 1:10:07 PMNo one really understands this and you are one of them, Activision is a publisher and Infinity ward are developers, you cant replace a publisher with a developer, its not hard...
-
I'd suggest they work with Eidos but I really like Eidos and wouldn't want to bring them down.
-
Bungie!
-
Thought Bethesda were an actual developer backed by zenimax?
-
Infinity ward is a Dev company not a publishing company.
-
Digital Extremes
-
Edited by SimplyB: 10/1/2014 1:00:47 PMOne publisher is like another so it doesn't matter.
-
Microsoft or sony are the obvious choices. Exclusives are just better. Period.
-
Bethesda, Bioware, or Blizzard. Any of these 3.
-
Ubisoft.
-
343, anyone who has the balls to take over Halo is good in my book
-
Bethesda
-
Anybody except activision
-
#offtopic?
-
Rocksteady. (Arkham series)
-
Anyone saying blizzard or bioware, you do realise activision and ea would be having their say in that?
-
...hmmm Square, they know the importance of story...
-
Bethesda all day every day. Bungie could have had the biggest openwork ever, been a few weeks late, and Bethesda would been like "it's all cool, the customers will love it" and we'd all be happy and つ ◕_◕ ༽つ Blame Crap-tivision つ ◕_◕ ༽つ because they still suck
-
Bethesda
-
-
Rockstar lol sure if you like being lied too.