JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Forums

originally posted in: Reasons to go vegan.
Edited by Pendulate: 10/6/2014 2:11:49 PM
1
They don't rely on a substitute for breastfeeding. That was my point -- if the mother consumes the proper nutrients, the pregnancy and infancy stages will be no different. I apologize if I came off as elitist, but I assure you there's a difference between arrogance and confidence. It's worth noting that I used to eat meat too, and I wasn't about to give it up easily. Making the change required some seriously convincing evidence and challenging of my beliefs. Consequently, if there are any good, rational reasons to consume meat I will approach them with an equally open mind. Problem is, I haven't heard any. Vegans certainly do not cause more harm than good, and again I don't think taking isolated incidents like that and making blanket statements is honest. Vegans are generally against the pet industries because they breed animals as commodities and treat them as novelties (puppy mills are patently unethical). If a vegan has a pet, there's a good chance they rescued it or bought it before becoming vegan. That being said, there are many sources out there for having healthy pets on a vegan diet -- this is obviously more difficult than with humans, but with careful attention, still maintainable I think. Especially since there is an entire industry for vegan pet foods.
English

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • I was under the impression they use substitutes for breast feeding, for that I apologize. Though that being said I don't think I'm going run into a doctor that recommends a vegan diet for a baby over a normal diet if I'm not a vegan. My point is people need to take responsibility. Wether it was an isolated incident or not, those vegan parents killed their babies by putting them on a vegan diet. I'm not saying there isn't healthy baby vegans, I'm saying there is more of a risk especially if they don't know what they are doing. As for the morality aspect of veganism, I could care less about cows, chickens and pigs. Doesn't mean I don't think equal consideration is appropriate. I'm going to eat meat, but I'd prefer that it wasn't caged and wallowing in it's own feces.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Edited by Pendulate: 10/7/2014 12:30:20 AM
    Of course they're responsible. Keep in mind that a vegan pregnancy isn't necessarily difficult, but there are relatively few dieticians who actually know anything about it. Which is why I linked a world-renowned one who does. If you don't care about the ethical side I'm not going to press you. But you should know that supporting something while at the same time saying "You know, I don't like what they're doing and it should be better...", isn't good enough. It's an insincere attempt to feel comfortable with your actions. But thanks for the discussion.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • [quote]But you should know that supporting something while at the same time saying "You know, I don't like what they're doing and it should be better...", isn't good enough. It's an insincere attempt to feel comfortable with your actions.[/quote] I don't know what this is about but sure. Good talking though.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • You said that you'd prefer if animals weren't caged and wallowing in their feces. I'm just saying it's intellectually insincere to say that yet still go and buy those animal products. Sorry, but I don't like to leave discussions on a misunderstanding.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Oh, I was referring to animal "equal consideration" not equal rights. There is a difference. Where as equal consideration is the extent of my morality towards animals.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • But you don't think animals should be caged?

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • If they don't have to. Doesn't mean I'm going to stop eating them. A lot of big corporate farming has already moved to cage free animals.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

  • Well, they don't have to. They only are because people give the corporations their money anyway. There's no incentive to change it.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

You are not allowed to view this content.
;
preload icon
preload icon
preload icon