{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/7/2014 3:06:35 AM
1
Except there are alternatives to all those things -- in different parts of the supermarket.
English
-
Edited by Sir Dempsey IV: 10/7/2014 10:46:32 AMYes, but some of them cost more, some of them taste weird, and it would also mean altering my diet at other food sources such as restaurants, and other people's houses.
-
That in no way constitutes a "huge inconvenience". You're taking the mildest inconvenience possible and overstating it. But obviously if convenience is more important to you than ethics, you don't need to even do that. You can just say it outright.
-
Edited by Sir Dempsey IV: 10/7/2014 11:34:41 AMReally? Not being able to have [i]any[/i] dairy products, meat or eggs isn't a huge inconvenience? I'm sorry, I've had enough bullshit for one thread. You can go find some other unfortunate soul to lecture about how you think you can stop the entire planet from killing animals and using them for food, and how you think having a bitchy diet will make that come about.
-
Yes, as someone who has lived both lifestyles, I am telling you it isn't a huge inconvenience. It's easy to form an incorrect opinion of something when you haven't actually tried it yourself.
