{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/11/2014 2:23:46 AM
39
Survival Life
Your camp was attacked and you and your buddies fended off the attackers and took 3 people prisoners. Supplies are low and they are extra mouths to feed. Would you kill them to remove the threat and have supplies; try to convert them and lose supplies building trust (this would cut your supply timeline in half); or set them free, risking a counter attack? How would you handle this situation, and why?
-
In any situation the safety of my group takes top priority over any others. However, I'm not completely heartless nor am I a tyrannical dictator. I'd let my group reach a consensus on what to do with them. If group decision is to kill them then I'll shoulder the burden and do it. If they decide to try and convert them fine, but I'll be watching the prisoners constantly. If they decide to free them fine. But I'll take an hour long piss break and just go hunt them down so we don't have to worry about them again. Also what kind of situation is this? Zombie apocalypse? Mad Max style wasteland? I only want to know because things change when I have to kill people twice.
