JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

#feedback

Edited by Leogan: 10/16/2014 12:00:11 AM
233
264
Leogan

The Kill Volume on Templar is the worst part of the Hotfix, and I'll tell you why (Constructive Feedback inside)

EDIT 1: I want to thank everyone who participated in the discussion so far. I didn't expect this topic to take off when I posted it last night, but I guess I wasn't alone in my thoughts. Special thanks to people who educated me about the Bonus Chest fact which you can't get through the platform Cheese, and everyone who maintained a positive, constructive tone (as well as stayed on topic). EDIT 2: Spelling and grammar, 'cause it was driving me nuts. There's been a lot of noise about the weapon nerfing/balancing during the 10/14/14 Hotfix. Most of it was pretty predictable. This isn't the first time [url=http://kotaku.com/death-threats-follow-small-call-of-duty-tweak-888324886]weapon stats have been tweaked in a FPS game[/url]. Arguments for and against have been pretty standard fare. Overall the changes seem fairly well calculated to balance the experience and extend enjoyment for the broadest subsection of players possible. To these I say 'Hoorah!'. I always liked Scout Rifles, now I am more justified in doing so. But the Kill Volume on the sniper platforms in the Templar encounter bothers me. It bothers me a lot. Please allow me to explain. I'm not against adjusting risk vs. reward. A true Cheese Strategy which makes a challenge trivial consequently trivializes the rewards that come after, and that is not good for games (this is why Atheon probably should have been patched first, but maybe solving that one is trickier and will take a bit of time). However, the "4 seconds until we kill you for playing the game incorrectly" solution to this is wrong on so many levels. An easy fix, yes, but quite possibly the laziest, and least fun way to patch the encounter. I worry about its implications on the overall philosophy behind what the game is supposed to be about. My problem is that it's almost always better to incentivize than to penalize. Invisible walls and kill zones are extremely heavy-handed penalization. They are a slap in the face, a clear message that you are trying to do something you were not intended to do. But finding an easy way to meet a challenge isn't always an exploit. In fact, finding a cool way to accomplish a task can be just as satisfying as getting loot for completing it, especially if you've been banging your head against the wall, failing constantly ahead of the suddenly successful idea. This is why my clan initially said we didn't want to watch Raid guide videos; we wanted the thrill of finding our own way. This stuff is gold, in terms of design. It isn't loot you have to make models, art, and stats for, but it can be just as essential. Slamming the door on it is, in my humble opinion, far worse than nerfing a cool weapon's damage. It's more like hacking players' inventories and [i]deleting[/i] that cool weapon, leaving a note saying "You are having fun incorrectly. You are playing [b]wrong[/b]" in its place. The sniper platforms were made. They were made reachable through our cool flight/jumping abilities. They included strategic cover. How could anyone [b]not[/b] anticipate players not wanting to try and use them? If we are worried about Cheese, here are some alternative ideas: [i]Make it tougher, enemies adapt[/i] - Goblins throw more grenades, target the platforms - Harpies fly out to platforms - Templar can hit platforms from longer range - Templar teleports one random player from platform instead of himself back into the arena [i]Make it cooler not to Cheese It[/i] - Include an achievement and/or additional rewards (shaders, emblems) for completing the encounter without anyone being marked by the Oracles (something you can't avoid by hiding on the platforms during the last phase, you just have to cleanse constantly because Oracles aren't dying). Patching how the encounter reacts to player strategies, rather than just killing them for using part of the map you designed and made available leaves the choice in the players' hands. They can still do it, but will probably choose a different strategy not because they feel forced, but because they will now figure out something that works better, and it will still feel rewarding because A) verisimilitude is maintained (of course hyper-intelligent robots are going to be smart enough to counter my camping), and B) you didn't have to slap them right in the ego with a kill volume which just seems to broadcast: [b]We didn't think of this! We will now wave a wand and you will play how we intend, your creativity is not the goal here, ours is[/b]. I like raiding. I want to keep figuring out new raiding mechanics and strategies with the friends I've made in this game. I don't want kill volumes to be the go to hotfix tool for future raids where players will inevitably find the paths of least resistance. Please keep this in mind and leave me my illusions of choice. They are really fun. Thank you for your time.

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Hello one and all but I have played MMO's for quite sometime now, and was for a time part of the EverQuest guild Ascended Dawn. I understand many of you will not understand who or what I am going to refer to so here is a simple explanation; 10 Years ago me, my guild were one of the top rated guilds in a game known as EverQuest - many of you have undoubtedly heard of it. Anyway Sony released a supposedly unkillable boss, it effectively 1 shoot everyone, had something akin to 1 billion hit points. For reference for none EQ players, a snake has 10 HP, a dragon 100,000 and a god 1-2 million. So what happened? Well my guild and three others put our differences aside and arranged to dedicate the day of 16th November to rising to the challenge of defeating Kerafyrm aka The Sleeper. After numerous wipes we eventually mixed up our strategy... After almost 3 hours we had managed to bring down the 'unkillable' boss down to 25%ish health. Using a simple yet equally difficult strategy. In simple forms we had countless DPSers and Support characters who simply revived those we fell to the Sleepers attacks. Anyway once we hit this point the Sleeper disappeared, mysteriously. The reason being Sony's dev team realized what we were doing, players were going to do what was meant to be impossible. They effectively removed the boss from the instance believing it to be 'bugged'. Regardless of what people believed we was given a second chance on the day following, thankfully many of us still had the monday free. Moving on we killed the unkillable. Since that day I learned something about games... Games are about challenges, about hurdles or puzzles or fights overcome. To some players, the biggest hurdle or challenge is how to do what you (the designer) said couldn't happen. If you are making a game, accept this. If players find a weakness or strategy that works, do not punish them, congratulate them on their achievement. After all isn't that the point of the game? Gamers can make unique individuals who are not afraid to rise to challenges individuals claim to be impossible. The same concept has always applied in a game I am very fond of DnD. If anyone has ever experianced a true game of DnD they know what I am talking about, players will often go off the rails finding ways to deal with the challenges you put before them that you never expected. As a DM do you then kill all your party because they just ruined your entire encounter by out smarting you at your own game? Hell no! You reward them, with experience points. DnD might I remind you all player or developer alike is ultimately the origin of the RPG and MMO. The same thing applies to the loot caves... nerfing them serves only serves to disincentives your player base.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    4 Replies
    1 2
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon