{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/29/2014 7:31:20 PM
1
It's still a part of the game and dlc which we have paid for. It's that we won't get everything we are paying for and that we won't get it for a entire year.
English
-
So when I buy the season pass for C.o.D on PS3 and pay for all the dlc packs, it's ok for Microsoft to pay extra to keep the entire dlc pack timed exclusive that is okay, but when Sony pays for a faction of the content of the Destiny expansion to be timed exclusive that is not okay?
-
I don't think it's okay that Microsoft does that and I want that changed as much as play station gamers do.
-
The difference is time. In cod you wait a month.... Not a year. Also that one strike is about 10-15% of the content not 1% it's not exactly adding that much for a dlc
-
so and entire dlc pack vs 10% of a dlc pack, you tell me which is worst
-
Do some research and educate yourself instead of spewing garbage that is in no way shape or form correct. Skyrim dlc had nothing to do with Microsoft. COD dlc was a month... You know 30 days, not a year. People are upset that they are paying the same price as you, but for less. It's like if we went and bought the exact same car but you had to wait a year to get rims and tires for your car. You'd be pretty pissed too while I was driving mine around. Not because I'm driving it around but because we paid the same price for it.... Does that make sense or should I use something simpler like apples and oranges?
-
10%when you pay for the whole thing.
