-
But not usually all to yourself
-
That makes it harder.
-
No it really doesn't. You dumb? 1 vs 6 against an unorganized team. The 6 rush to the 1 single file "feeding" him kills. The 1 has 6 targets to kill. The 6 only have 1 target to kill. If they aren't working together the 1 has a huge advantage over the 6. Years of halo experience talking.
-
No. You're dumb. So shooting 3 ppl at one time is harder than shooting 1v1? Shut the -blam!- up.
-
You stupid? Not once was it 1 v 3. They were streaming to him single file.
-
You're clearly blind. He had them coming from both sides. #dismissed. Idiot
-
Edited by JetEyeKnight: 11/4/2014 1:31:23 AMNo you moron, both sides but 1 at a time! Anyone could do that! In fact that's how I prefer it!
-
HEY IF YOU LIKE IT FROM BOTH SIDES THATS YOUR PERSONAL BUSINESS lmaooooo
-
There ya go being gay again, why don't you just come out of the closet
-
Live your truth
-
Well yea! You're not getting the point. All 6 are solely focused on one person. That one person is the only one that gets kills because HE IS ALONE. Without anyone else to distract them, the 6 are forced to go to that 1 person, increasing his odds of getting kills (as long as he isn't absolutely swarmed). I've always loved being outnumbered (not 6>1). Being one or two short is always a benefit.
-
They came 3 at a time he was surrounded. Point is irrelevant
-
Well at least I don't ever have to see a post from you again. That's refreshing
-
What was that?
-
Wrong. That increases the chance of running into multiple enemies at the same time with no backup. Which is what clearly happened.
-
You're a lost cause. Being outnumbered is better. It's been that way since Goldeneye on n64 Probably way before that