{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Broc:
11/7/2014 4:25:51 AM
1
This poll is ridiculous.. by the wording a person running through a strike isn't a completionist, but in fact the fastest way to complete 100% of the game is to run through pretty much everything since all the environments and enemies are recycled...
[u]Do you have fun killing the same enemies over and over? If so why?[/u]
[b]Do you [/b]enjoy the XP you get? If so I can tell you 100 ways to earn XP faster.
[b]Do you[/b] enjoy increasing your grimoire score? If so I can tell you 100 ways to earn grim faster.
[b]Do you [/b]enjoy the game itself? If so why are you complaining about the one area in the entire game that this play style hurts you?
[b]There is a HUGE difference between a person who goes to all the objectives and does them as quickly as possible, and those who skip objectives i.e. your Mars example. The first person is completely justified, the second should be punished as harshly as Idlers should be for the reasons you give.[/b]
English
-
So crucify this guy because he's wrong? Wow, harsh.
-
Edited by Broc: 11/7/2014 4:51:36 AMIf I'm crucifying anyone with my post it's the OP, not this guy. The guy who's comment I commented on is on opposite sides of the same coin as me.. the OP on the other hand obviously didn't think about half of what he wanted to convey before conveying it, which you can see clearly in his sentence structure and varying tone.
-
I couldn't have said it better myself. And in fact I didn't. There would be no problem whatsoever if the consequences of being a runner didn't affect me as a completionist. Which they often do.
