{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/28/2014 3:58:48 AM
6
You can nuke EITHER Africa or the Middle East...
-
Africa would make a better post-nuclear wasteland. Mutated lions and elephants and crap.
-
-
Middle East: >smaller area >higher population >richer population >more worldly necessity in Middle East Africa: >much larger >lower population >poorer population (on average) >large home of deadly disease Obviously Africa, you wouldn't even have to kill anyone if you blew a bomb up there. And I didn't mention the wealth of the two places to say that poor people deserve to die, I said that because rich people have more power and connections, meaning that blowing rich people up will anger other people
-
1 ReplyMiddle East that way the world can be better without these religious territories.
-
Hmm, tough choice. Do I end world poverty or do I end terrorism? Poverty it is.
-
Africa has diamonds, gems, metals, etc. but a lot of people and Ebola. Middle East has oil but a lotta people - and terrorists. Hard choice.
