{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/28/2014 2:51:37 PM
1
You're talking a statistic of one flip. Which is not the same as op is talking about. If you flip a coin 100 times, what's your chance of never hitting tails?
English
-
On a RANDOM probability it cannot be based off of the AMOUNT OF TIMES it comes. I'm saying for him to assume it's not RNG based on what has happened is invalid. Just like flipping a coin 100 times. Each TIME you flip it there is a 50% chance for it to be heads. Sure it's unlikely that it will never land on tails, but being relevant to the post, that does not make it not RNG. That is what my entire reply is about. His math is correct, but it's incorrect to say it's not RNG because of his math.
-
If you had said those last few sentences in your original post and stopped calling people idiots, you would've gotten a lot less hate.
-
If people would read what I originally said properly I wouldn't have a reason to call them idiots.
-
Might want to take a look at his newest edit.
-
He's STATING he's not RNG in his original post and I was proving it wrong that you cannot use probability to debunk RNG. That was the ENTIRE purpose of my response. Personally I believe there is an outside influence, but this does not prove that it's not RNG.
-
Now you're talking sense. I will also continue to believe he's RNG based until I see definitive proof from someone at bungie saying otherwise. Must've forgot the part where he made a claim that it was RNG or not.
-
Lol it's in the title of the post! :p
-
That would explain why xD
-
Let me change the perspective I guess. If you were rolling dice with someone, your number was one & the other persons was 6, the dice lands on 6 every time for 50 rolls, do think that something is not happening correctly? Or that you saw a miracle?
-
All I'm saying in my response is that u can not base RNG on probability. Maybe I should of been more extensive and clear. My apologies.
