On a RANDOM probability it cannot be based off of the AMOUNT OF TIMES it comes. I'm saying for him to assume it's not RNG based on what has happened is invalid. Just like flipping a coin 100 times. Each TIME you flip it there is a 50% chance for it to be heads. Sure it's unlikely that it will never land on tails, but being relevant to the post, that does not make it not RNG. That is what my entire reply is about. His math is correct, but it's incorrect to say it's not RNG because of his math.