You misunderstood what he was saying. He said the probability it occurs 4 consecutive weeks. So it is dependent on the previous weeks outcome.
Edit: I misspoke, he said the probability that when chest armor goes on sale, it is voidfangs, four occurrences in a row. That doesn't change anything but I thought I should clarify because I think that is where the misunderstanding came.
Source: I've taken enough statistic courses in college to make most lose their minds
English
-
his point for the post is to say that it isn't random bc the the probability is close to 0 (basically). that is a false premise. the math is invalid as a proof. that is my point. the fact that it will be a small probability for it to occur four weeks in a row is completely irrelevant.
-
Nothing is irrelevant to the statistically illiterate.