May I also add the fact that several of the supposed witnesses said he DID attack the officer, so should those witnesses be ignored? In which case, shall we ignore the witnesses that claimed that he didn't have his hands up? What about the ones that claimed he was flat on the ground and was shot through the BACK of the head? Even the other kid that was right there claimed things that didn't freaking happen! he claims that Mike was shot in the back, medical evidence disproves this. His mother claimed that he wasn't a violent kid and could never hurt a fly, so what about the store footage? She seems strangely quiet about that smudge on her son's character. But of course, this kid was totally innocent and didn't do anything right? Just another malicious white guy out to kill black people right? Get wrecked bub.