Honestly, anyone who fails to read the license agreement gets exactly what he/she deserves. As a responsible consumer, every who uses any type of software should understand the laws which govern it, respective to where in the world that person lives. One of the larger issues in the gaming community is people do not realize that by playing a game, you have entered into a contract. Feigning ignorance on the matter does not excuse the fact that you were a party to that contract. Again, depending on jurisdiction, by installing software without reading the agreement, you are doing no differently than signing a mortgage or a motor vehicle loan without reading it. It is all about protection of rights, as well as identifying liability. This is not unique to this game, Bungie (which is already an incorrect assumption, as Activision is the license grantor, as they are the distributor/publisher), any game, or any individual piece of software. License agreements have existed for as long as you have had commercially available software, and they will continue to exist for as long as software is developed and sold. What people fail to realize, mostly by grabbing out of context blurbs for the license on the forum, is that there are multiple places where your rights, as a consumer, are clearly laid out. Consumer responsibility does not end at the point of purchase, period. This community blindly pre-orders games and content without informing themselves on multiple levels. No matter how much people hate on corporations, with a lot of it being deserved, they cannot force you to make those informed decisions that consumers make in all other facets of the commercial marketplace. As it directly applies to both Nightfall and the Weekly heroic, nothing has changed. The argument is bandied about how it has been "removed", and that is just plain wrong. The feature, both technically and legally, has always cycled through content that you had a license for. Up until Tuesday, you were licensed for all content, because that is what you had paid permission to access. What has changed is that there is content for which you are not licensed for that are going to be continued to be rotated through those features. You have rightfully been locked out of those features, which continue to function, because you have not purchased a license for the content. It is, ultimately, not about what people who have not purchased the content are failing to access, but about the fact that people who have purchased that same content should be allowed to have access to it through that same feature. No company in their right mind is going to give content away that others have paid for, nor are the going to punish people who purchased it by not showcasing it. Ultimately, there is no "new leaf" to turn over. They rewarded customer loyalty, and nothing more. Your decision to not continue on the journey and make the same purchase that I did, simply should not mean that I not be rewarded for my purchase. In fact, they should continually be looking to the future of the game and focusing on the end goal, continuing to reward those who shift their own end goals to match that of the game, as a whole. I am not trying to "rationalize" it, as you put it. More factually, I have done my research before making my purchases, I did read the license agreement beforehand, and I saw nothing any different than I would see if I bought an operating system, productivity suite, or other game.

One DLC and all of a sudden everyone's a paralegal. Sad.

The EULA agreement for almost every piece of software developed contains that language. Also the language that states you lease the content. All you own is a disc (if you bought a disc). US Circuit Court of Appeals has held that the language in both of those instances is legal and binding. None of the cases have made the Supreme Court, so as it stands everyone developer puts this in to mitigate/eliminate basically all liability from any claims against them.

Guess who else does this, every time they release an expansion, major content patch, or dlc? Everyone. Everyone does this. It's nothing new, and their EULA looks identical, vice the name of the parties involved, to every other EULA I've read. Also Bungie didn't write this. Activision did.

Last night I got also a pop up to accept EULA, I declined, what now? I do not have the DLC, so in their EULA stands I may have a refund, is that right ?! Edit: Can someone help me out here, I really don´t know what my options are at the moment....

EULA in a court of law is void because you are forced to agree to play a game you already paid for. You need to be able to read these before purchase for them to hold up in court. Spoken out of experience

At least the market is taking note that Activision is killing the goose that laid the golden egg. Stock down 15% since Destiny launch.

to put it in a EULA doesnt mean its legal and binding, lots of them have been challenged and overturned, its just them trying it on...

I thought it was strange to be prompted to agree to it right there. Those clever and pesky lawyers. *tips cap to Bungie* Well played.