{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by Spank:
12/19/2014 8:52:12 PM
4
Can't prove a negative. Yout can't prove that Santa Claus doesn't exist, you can only prove that all of your presents came from your parents.
It's very hard to prove a negative which is why the burden of proof is on the other side. We don't have to DISPROVE Santa's existence, it's up to you to PROVE his existence.
The same applies to the existence of Jesus. Or anyone and anything else for that matter.
English
-
Dude, Santa was created by Coca-Cola.
-
I know. I'm using it as an example. I don't think Santa Is real dumbass.
-
It's a fact that Santa clause is a myth, because the person who came up with him intended him to be make belief, other than that I agree with you
-
It's not impossible for someone to make something up intending it to be a myth and then have it either A: turn out to be true. Or B: have someone else come in and make it a reality. Don't Get me wrong, I don't believe that Santa exists, but like any good scientist, the reason I don't believe is because there isn't any compelling evidence to believe he does. I'm not going to eliminate the possibility that such evidence may become available in the future. Long story short, super -blam!-ing hard to prove a negative.
