{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
Edited by The Cellar Door:
1/8/2015 12:07:18 AM
1
Nothing can be proven to exist if we cannot distinguish from non existence
English
-
Nothing can be technically proven, yes.
-
So the argument is illogical because neither distinction is plausible.
-
In which case, again, as I said, either nothing exists or everything does then.
-
So both distinctions cannot exist simultaneously, and as such you cannot prove existence from non existence, and furthermore your question is illogical
-
Lol I really don't even know what I'm arguing anymore. This thread reached a lot more replies than I expected.
