If the earlier catch made by GB was considered a catch should better be a catch also!
English
-
Agreed.
-
YUP! So much bullshit.
-
Edited by Erkyo: 1/11/2015 9:07:10 PMI Never like this rule where the refs determine whats a complete catch and what isn't. Its too much gray area and opinionated. To me he had the ball with both hands he feet touched the ground, he rolled and the ground cause a fumble that he recovered. And the NFL says the ground can't cause a fumble so there for it should have been a catch.
-
-
Looks incomplete, he should've just hugged it