You are more than entitled to your opinion, but I simply will not fall victim to the repeating pattern of brainwashing that runs rampant around here. This community generated excess hype, and then when their own extrapolations of what that really meant were not met, they lay blame at everyone's feet but their own - and the same thing happens every time there is an impending release, and it will continue to happen because this community will not accept the fact that they have a responsibility to be an informed consumer. That is no one's fault but your own. Citing works in progress as completed content does not become factual because it is repeated, over and over. In the software development industry, we regularly include artifacts that are not complete. Code paths mature at different frequencies, and there is value in pushing things as they sit. The "Ultra Captain" argument... It is old and tired. They go to the effort of naming minor bosses all throughout the game. If they learned a lesson from that one, it is that they should have called him "Placeholder Pete" - but I don't even think that could drive the point home. I am more than okay with their development approach, because it is much more common than you will ever realize. It is not proof of the Illuminati, but a mature industry standard that is not going to change because the consumers do not understand it.