{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/16/2015 7:48:03 AM
6
Presumably the point of this is to prove that it's impossible to say whether we actually exist or not, so surely because it's impossible to say we should jut proceed under the assumption that we do and ignore the whole issue
English
-
Why proceed under presumptions? I want proof.
-
I was assuming the purpose of your thread was that it was impossible to find proof, and as such we should just ignore the question as it is unanswerable
-
The purpose is that there is no proof? What? The purpose is for someone to present proof.
-
Well, we know for sure we exist in some form, at least, but it's impossible to say what form that is, that's what I think at least
-
Because it's impossible to experimentally test whether or not the reality we experience is the ultimate reality, or whether it is an incredibly detailed simulation or some other scenario
-
Maybe we're looking for the wrong type of proof.
