Which is better?
Got both from engrams and they both have void damage and the same middle perk options of Flared Magwell (Faster Reloads) / Field Scout (Increased mag size) / Perfect Balance (very low recoil)
RoF: Harm's Way has much higher
Impact: All Odds has much higher
Range: All Odds has higher
Stability: Harm's Way has much higher
Reload: Harm's Way slightly better
Magazine (w/o and w/ Field Scout): All Odds has 26/50; Harm's Way has double (54/100)
And here are the unique perks for each:
Harm's Way
- Counter balance (increased stability)
- Grenadier (Kills reduce grenade cool down)
All Odds
- Rodeo (Reduces severity of recoil)
- Surplus (Find more ammo)
-
They're both wrong my jolders hammer eats everything
-
AAO just destroys me in pvp when I use the harms way. So there you go
-
surplus is actually awesome. purple drops errywhere and rodeo is solid too.
-
Definitely Against All Odds. That gun is an absolute beast! Looks like you got some sick perks as well on it.
-
I have both as well but I prefer against all odds because it hits a lot harder, kinda like the swarm of you ever had one
-
Thunderlord. :D
-
all odds
-
Against All Odds is superior.
-
Neither, Deviant Gravity-A.
-
Depends really. Both are mediocre PvE, but against all odds absolutely wrecks in PvP. I'd say, given your perks, field scout Against All Odds either way it goes.
-
I have both and I prefer harms way for the 100 round clip which is amazing against large mobs or bosses
-
I feel i got very lucky in my Harms Way with Spray and Play, Field Scout, and Feeding Frenzy. I have dusted 6 other legendary machine guns that couldnt keep up.