{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
2/5/2015 10:47:19 PM
1
I actually [i]read[/i] the update. Most of them were much needed nerfs.
English
-
Edited by bnarsty: 2/5/2015 10:58:31 PMYeah I read it too. They are basing most off these nerfs on the amount of kills people are getting with said weapons and how often people use them. You really think auto rifles needed a range nerf as well as making them higher rate of fire and more cqc oriented? Yeah I don't think so
-
My whole thing is that we don't even know how drastic these changes actually are, yet people are already b!tching about it. The whole reason they did a slight change to auto rifles was to make room for the pulse rifle buffs. Before they gave the very first nerf to auto rifles, that was all people complained about. "Oh too many auto rifles not enough variety." After the first patch the same people complained that now the auto rifles suck. THE FIRST PATCH DIDN'T EVEN CHANGE THAT MUCH.
-
My problem is really what they are doing but why. They show in the update with their graphs that tons of people are using auto rifles and use that as a basis for the nerf. They take a gun that's barely useable in PVE that people are still using and make a conscious decision to make them worse. I don't know where they get these ideas
