{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:TFS The Floods Sanctuary
View Entire Topic
3/1/2013 4:38:00 PM
50
Halo Reach vs Halo 4
Halo Reach gave me more fun multiplayer wise, but I liked Halo 4's campaign slightly better because it was new.
Halo 4 just felt like no effort was put into it at all. I sort of like the Bungie touch to the game
-
3 RepliesProblems with Halo 4 (in my opinion): - No Theater in campaign. - Lacked firefight. - Spartan Ops was repetitive, boring, laggy, and generally unimpressive, excluding the CGI cutscenes. - Lacked a nice big open forge map. - Multiplayer isn't as entertaining as it could have been. - Campaign felt short, confrontation between Didact and Chief was awful. - Shift to a more CoD style of play in multiplayer. - Lacked nice map variety, no map really stood out to me like Sandtrap. - Lack of nice big, open vehicle maps. Problems with Reach: - Conflicted with canon. - Characters were on the 2-D side. - Armor abilities needed some fine tuning. - Not enough done with space combat. - Not enough done with the Assembly. Overall, I liked Reach better than Halo 4. Halo 4 is a good game, as is Reach, but it lacks something that Reach had. I can't quite put my finger on it, but they feel like entirely different series.
