I know of people who are considering legal action against people who profit while others are on their stream as well. I work with lots of firms in Los Angeles that are expanding digital law. Streamers should be careful who is involved in their streams and how public they announce their revenue. It could violate right to publicity laws which are what they plan on attacking. That being said, i don't care what people feel about it, but it's going to happen to high profit streamers that don't use disclosure and are very public about what they make while using others in their video. This is to set precedence, nothing more. If you don't know law or why a case like this is important to further digital law, then don't bother posting.