{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/26/2015 2:26:18 PM
3
You're saying that hunters have 2 op supers, but your super is a combination of the best parts of those supers.
English
-
We get one, stronger, and they get two, less stronger
-
[quote]We get one, stronger, and they get two, less stronger[/quote] You're saying that as if hunters can use both "op supers" at once... but let me tell you the real kicker here... [spoiler]you're the one who actually gets the best parts of the two supers you're complaining about [/spoiler]
-
Here's the real kicker [spoiler]I'm not complaining about them[/spoiler]
-
Yes that was my point.
-
[quote]Yes that was my point.[/quote] So... you're saying that you've got a subclass which is the combination of the best part of 2 "OP" supers, but the one you've got is somehow [i]not[/i] op? How does that logic work? Hint: It doesn't. I'll give you a math analogy. I'll keep the numbers low, so it's easy to follow. Let's say the blade dancer and gunslinger are both 5 points. Take the best parts of it, so let's call that 3 a piece, and combine them. That makes 6. So you're saying the 5s are op but 6 isn't?
-
Read? I said it was OP...
-
With upgrades to ammo and shields.
